S5: “Visuals can communicate complex ideas with clarity, precision, efficiency and convey the most knowledge in the shortest time and the smallest space.” (Turfte, 1983).
DC: Surely, the well-learned has grounds to make a point. But, what about Words? Clarity, precision and efficiency? Probably the same can be claimed for language too. But what about time and space? Perhaps not. Just have a look at most of the signage on public transports. [Examples] Visuals are not there just to attract. Visuals, compared with Words, seem to demand less mental efforts to comprehend.
Then, what are the strengths of Words? Allow imagination? Stimulate imagination? Do Visuals confine imagination simply because they are clear and precise?
I’ve been fond of Words. I wonder how the saying ‘a picture is worth a thousand words’ handles the challenge of rendering itself in picture. As a language teacher, I used to craft my words and go without any graphic. But alas, once a colleague suggested putting on some graphics on the poster that I designed and it looked better [Example: fruits.doc]. Later, I couldn’t stop and put on more! [Example: during-the-loooooooooooooong-holidays.doc]
I’ll say, Words and Visuals complement each other. And we still haven’t talked about Audios the sounds! Combined, the three can be very powerful in conveying messages. Yet, multiple interpretations are possible with the film – it’s pictures in Motion!
S6: “… and allow information consumer to manipulate and explore it in search for understanding.”
DC: So, Visuals go interactivity. That’s motions in one’s hands. Just fancy that. How much fun would that be? But first of all, how much time and efforts will it take to learn the tricks of those new “tech-toys” before producing the visual displays?
S8 & 11: The Minard’s Map (Turfte, 1983)
DC: Yes, indeed, it’s a good example to model after at least for its:
- capture of multivariate complexit
- high quality content
- smallest effective differences
S12: So, the interactive elements? Here you are …
DC: pull-down lists, slides, buttons, hyper-links, hot-spots, haptic input, text-inputs, radio buttons, check boxes and key-press…(Let alone the making of them – but what are some of these, anyway?)
S13-17: Some interesting examples?
DC: Sure they are interesting and not just interesting. They are fascinating to me, especially, the great ideas (that’s imagination!) behind them. Also, the collaboration – just think of how much efforts are geared into each of the project! Great ideas attract people.
S19: The Pyramid!
DC: Oh, this visual reminds me the Virtual Tours links that I gave my students some time ago. They are so much fun. They are interactive! Here you are:
[Examples]
The Pyramid
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/pyramid/
Taj Mahal
http://www.taj-mahal.net/blackLarge.htm
Eiffel Tower
http://www.tour-eiffel.fr/
The Great Wall
http://www.thebeijingguide.com/great_wall_of_china/index.html
Sydney Opera House
http://www.sydneyoperahouse.com/sections/tours/virtual_tour/?sm=3&ss=11
Enjoy!
S19-22: Back to the Future: Visuals, Thinking and Learning
DC: Oh, yes, in the beginning, there were no words. We see things and do things (demonstration, imitation, interactive…). Then we abstracted our experiences into words and there language came into the “picture”.
I see, we are back to the basics now.
We are already into a new era of communication – more directly and effectively – for and to the new generation. But are they also poor in using language as the tool for thinking?
No Comments »
Filed under: Refelctions and Dialogues